Trust signals
Why this verdict
PkgRadar discounts a release’s score when public reputation argues against novel malware. The verdict above already reflects these — the panel just explains what was applied.
- Weekly downloads
- 520
- Versions published
- 6
- First published
- May 2026
- Publisher
- 7majesty
Recommended action
Looks clean — keep monitoringNo high-signal indicators in the stored static report. PkgRadar will re-check on the next ingest pass.
Block this release in CIcurl · GitHub Actions
Fail the build when this package version is added or upgraded. Replace $PKGRADAR_TOKEN with a Pro / Team API key from your dashboard.
curl -fsS https://pkgradar.com/gate/npm \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $PKGRADAR_TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"specs":["[email protected]"],"fail_on":"review"}'GitHub Actions step:
- name: PkgRadar gate
run: |
curl -fsS https://pkgradar.com/gate/npm \
-H "Authorization: Bearer ${{ secrets.PKGRADAR_TOKEN }}" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"specs":["[email protected]"],"fail_on":"review"}'Why flagged
What the scanner saw
No high-signal static finding in the saved report.
Not observed: package install, lifecycle script execution, or sandbox execution. PkgRadar only inspects on-disk artifacts.
Availability ledger
available
Status history (1 event)
- new → available · risk low · score 0 · status changed
Evidence
Static findings
No findings stored for this release.
Manifest
Package metadata
Scripts12
buildtscdevtsx watch src/index.tsformatprettier --write "src/**/*.ts" "tests/**/*.ts"format:checkprettier --check "src/**/*.ts" "tests/**/*.ts"linteslint src --ext .tslint:fixeslint src --ext .ts --fixpreparenpm run buildstartnode dist/index.jstestvitest runtest:coveragevitest run --coveragetest:watchvitesttypechecktsc --noEmit
Dependencies8
@modelcontextprotocol/sdk^1.0.0dockerode^4.0.2glob^11.0.0pino^9.4.0pino-pretty^11.2.2terminal-guardian-mcp^1.2.0ws^8.21.0zod^3.23.8