Trust signals
Why this verdict
PkgRadar discounts a release’s score when public reputation argues against novel malware. The verdict above already reflects these — the panel just explains what was applied.
- Versions published
- 28
- First published
- Feb 2026
- Publisher
- tylerbuell
Recommended action
Looks clean — keep monitoringNo high-signal indicators in the stored static report. PkgRadar will re-check on the next ingest pass.
Block this release in CIcurl · GitHub Actions
Fail the build when this package version is added or upgraded. Replace $PKGRADAR_TOKEN with a Pro / Team API key from your dashboard.
curl -fsS https://pkgradar.com/gate/npm \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $PKGRADAR_TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"specs":["[email protected]"],"fail_on":"review"}'GitHub Actions step:
- name: PkgRadar gate
run: |
curl -fsS https://pkgradar.com/gate/npm \
-H "Authorization: Bearer ${{ secrets.PKGRADAR_TOKEN }}" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"specs":["[email protected]"],"fail_on":"review"}'Why flagged
What the scanner saw
No high-signal static finding in the saved report.
Not observed: package install, lifecycle script execution, or sandbox execution. PkgRadar only inspects on-disk artifacts.
Availability ledger
available
Status history (1 event)
- new → available · risk low · score 0 · status changed
Evidence
Static findings
No findings stored for this release.
Manifest
Package metadata
Scripts2
buildtsuptypechecktsc --noEmit
Dependencies17
@reactive-agents/a2a0.10.4@reactive-agents/cli0.10.4@reactive-agents/core0.10.4@reactive-agents/cost0.10.4@reactive-agents/eval0.10.4@reactive-agents/guardrails0.10.4@reactive-agents/identity0.10.4@reactive-agents/interaction0.10.4@reactive-agents/llm-provider0.10.4@reactive-agents/memory0.10.4@reactive-agents/observability0.10.4@reactive-agents/orchestration0.10.4@reactive-agents/prompts0.10.4@reactive-agents/reasoning0.10.4@reactive-agents/runtime0.10.4@reactive-agents/tools0.10.4@reactive-agents/verification0.10.4