Trust signals
Why this verdict
PkgRadar discounts a release’s score when public reputation argues against novel malware. The verdict above already reflects these — the panel just explains what was applied.
- Versions published
- 1
- First published
- Jun 2026
- Publisher
- andrew_souls
Recommended action
Looks clean — keep monitoringNo high-signal indicators in the stored static report. PkgRadar will re-check on the next ingest pass.
Block this release in CIcurl · GitHub Actions
Fail the build when this package version is added or upgraded. Replace $PKGRADAR_TOKEN with a Pro / Team API key from your dashboard.
curl -fsS https://pkgradar.com/gate/npm \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $PKGRADAR_TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"specs":["[email protected]"],"fail_on":"review"}'GitHub Actions step:
- name: PkgRadar gate
run: |
curl -fsS https://pkgradar.com/gate/npm \
-H "Authorization: Bearer ${{ secrets.PKGRADAR_TOKEN }}" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"specs":["[email protected]"],"fail_on":"review"}'Why flagged
What the scanner saw
No high-signal static finding in the saved report.
Not observed: package install, lifecycle script execution, or sandbox execution. PkgRadar only inspects on-disk artifacts.
Availability ledger
available
Status history (1 event)
- new → available · risk low · score 0 · status changed
Evidence
Static findings
No findings stored for this release.
Manifest
Package metadata
Scripts7
buildnpm run build -w @dom-pilot/shared && npm run build -w @dom-pilot/overlay && npm run build -w @dom-pilot/mcp-server && npm run build -w @dom-pilot/vite-plugin && npm run build -w @dom-pilot/clichecknpm run typecheck && npm testlintnpm run typecheckpack:dry-runnpm pack --dry-runprepacknpm run buildtestvitest runtypechecktsc -b
Dependencies9
@babel/generator^7.28.5@babel/parser^7.28.5@babel/traverse^7.28.5@babel/types^7.28.5@modelcontextprotocol/sdk^1.29.0css-tree^3.1.0parse5^7.2.1ws^8.21.0zod^4.4.3