Trust signals
Why this verdict
PkgRadar discounts a release’s score when public reputation argues against novel malware. The verdict above already reflects these — the panel just explains what was applied.
- Weekly downloads
- 703
- Versions published
- 14
- First published
- Apr 2026
- Publisher
- demomacro
Recommended action
Looks clean — keep monitoringNo high-signal indicators in the stored static report. PkgRadar will re-check on the next ingest pass.
Block this release in CIcurl · GitHub Actions
Fail the build when this package version is added or upgraded. Replace $PKGRADAR_TOKEN with a Pro / Team API key from your dashboard.
curl -fsS https://pkgradar.com/gate/npm \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $PKGRADAR_TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"specs":["[email protected]"],"fail_on":"review"}'GitHub Actions step:
- name: PkgRadar gate
run: |
curl -fsS https://pkgradar.com/gate/npm \
-H "Authorization: Bearer ${{ secrets.PKGRADAR_TOKEN }}" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"specs":["[email protected]"],"fail_on":"review"}'Why flagged
What the scanner saw
No high-signal static finding in the saved report.
Not observed: package install, lifecycle script execution, or sandbox execution. PkgRadar only inspects on-disk artifacts.
Availability ledger
available
Status history (1 event)
- new → available · risk low · score 0 · status changed
Evidence
Static findings
No findings stored for this release.
Manifest
Package metadata
Scripts7
buildvp packcheckvp check --fixdemo:docxnode dist/cli.mjs docx demo/1-docx.json "My Document.docx"demo:pptxnode dist/cli.mjs pptx demo/2-pptx.json "My Presentation.pptx"demo:xlsxnode dist/cli.mjs xlsx demo/3-xlsx.json "My Workbook.xlsx"devbasis build --stubtestvp test run
Dependencies7
@office-open/core0.9.5@office-open/docx0.9.5@office-open/pptx0.9.5@office-open/xlsx0.9.5@office-open/xml0.9.5citty0.2.2zod4.4.3