PkgRadar

Package evidence

[email protected]

Install Lifecycle Remote Or Exec: postinstall="node -e \"console.log('\\nNotice: this module will be rewritten and changed. Consider switching to nodemon.\\n')\""

Trust signals

Why this verdict

PkgRadar discounts a release’s score when public reputation argues against novel malware. The verdict above already reflects these — the panel just explains what was applied.

Weekly downloads
13,676Mainstream · −50% score
Versions published
13Established · −30% score
First published
May 2011
Publisher
iliakan

Effective trust discount applied: 50% (max across signals — discounts don’t stack). New install-lifecycle deltas vs the previous release would clear the discount.

Recommended action

Block this update

Static evidence trips multiple high-signal indicators. Quarantine the release until the publisher validates the change or you can rule out the indicators below.

Block this release in CIcurl · GitHub Actions

Fail the build when this package version is added or upgraded. Replace $PKGRADAR_TOKEN with a Pro / Team API key from your dashboard.

curl -fsS https://pkgradar.com/gate/npm \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $PKGRADAR_TOKEN" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"specs":["[email protected]"],"fail_on":"high"}'

GitHub Actions step:

- name: PkgRadar gate
  run: |
    curl -fsS https://pkgradar.com/gate/npm \
      -H "Authorization: Bearer ${{ secrets.PKGRADAR_TOKEN }}" \
      -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
      -d '{"specs":["[email protected]"],"fail_on":"high"}'
Publisheriliakan
Artifact bytes4,833
Previous version0.1.3
Published2026-05-28T05:02:42.099Z
SHA-2563ff998f54a0184604f2ffffd001ed848004c10165e4ba50f164473adfd484af8

Why flagged

What the scanner saw

New Lifecycle Script Vs Previous: postinstall added in 0.1.4 vs 0.1.3: "node -e \"console.log('\\nNotice: this module will be rewritten and changed. Consider switching to nodemon.\\n')\""

Not observed: package install, lifecycle script execution, or sandbox execution. PkgRadar only inspects on-disk artifacts.

Availability ledger

available

high
Last checked
highRisk
75Score
0.1.4Version
Status history (2 events)
  1. availableavailable · risk high · score 75 · status available -> available, risk high -> high, score 45 -> 75
  2. newavailable · risk high · score 45 · status changed

Evidence

Static findings

2 static · 1 from release diff · showing high-signal first.

SeverityKindPathDetailPoints
highNew Lifecycle Script Vs Previouspackage.jsonpostinstall added in 0.1.4 vs 0.1.3: "node -e \"console.log('\\nNotice: this module will be rewritten and changed. Consider switching to nodemon.\\n')\""40
highInstall Lifecycle Remote Or Execpackage.jsonpostinstall="node -e \"console.log('\\nNotice: this module will be rewritten and changed. Consider switching to nodemon.\\n')\""30
Show all 3 findings (low-signal and informational)
SeverityKindPathDetailPoints
highNew Lifecycle Script Vs Previouspackage.jsonpostinstall added in 0.1.4 vs 0.1.3: "node -e \"console.log('\\nNotice: this module will be rewritten and changed. Consider switching to nodemon.\\n')\""40
highInstall Lifecycle Remote Or Execpackage.jsonpostinstall="node -e \"console.log('\\nNotice: this module will be rewritten and changed. Consider switching to nodemon.\\n')\""30
lowInstall-time lifecycle scriptpackage.jsonpostinstall="node -e \"console.log('\\nNotice: this module will be rewritten and changed. Consider switching to nodemon.\\n')\""5

Manifest

Package metadata

Scripts1
  • postinstallnode -e "console.log('\nNotice: this module will be rewritten and changed. Consider switching to nodemon.\n')"
Dependencies1
  • inotify>= 0.1.6