Trust signals
Why this verdict
PkgRadar discounts a release’s score when public reputation argues against novel malware. The verdict above already reflects these — the panel just explains what was applied.
- Versions published
- 2
- First published
- Jun 2026
- Publisher
- vincent06220
Recommended action
Looks clean — keep monitoringNo high-signal indicators in the stored static report. PkgRadar will re-check on the next ingest pass.
Block this release in CIcurl · GitHub Actions
Fail the build when this package version is added or upgraded. Replace $PKGRADAR_TOKEN with a Pro / Team API key from your dashboard.
curl -fsS https://pkgradar.com/gate/npm \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $PKGRADAR_TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"specs":["[email protected]"],"fail_on":"review"}'GitHub Actions step:
- name: PkgRadar gate
run: |
curl -fsS https://pkgradar.com/gate/npm \
-H "Authorization: Bearer ${{ secrets.PKGRADAR_TOKEN }}" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"specs":["[email protected]"],"fail_on":"review"}'Why flagged
What the scanner saw
No high-signal static finding in the saved report.
Not observed: package install, lifecycle script execution, or sandbox execution. PkgRadar only inspects on-disk artifacts.
Availability ledger
available
Status history (1 event)
- new → available · risk low · score 0 · status changed
Evidence
Static findings
No findings stored for this release.
Manifest
Package metadata
Scripts10
buildnpm run build:hash && tsup && npm run build:indexbuild:hashtsx scripts/inject-meta-hash.tsbuild:indextsx scripts/build-search-index.tsdevtsup --watchinspect:httpmcp-inspector http://localhost:3000/api/mcpinspect:stdiomcp-inspector node ./dist/transport/stdio.jstestvitest runtest:watchvitesttypechecktsc --noEmitvalidate-contenttsx scripts/validate-content.ts
Dependencies6
@modelcontextprotocol/sdk^1.0.0gray-matter^4.0.3lunr^2.3.9remark^15.0.1remark-stringify^11.0.0zod^3.23.8