Trust signals
Why this verdict
PkgRadar discounts a release’s score when public reputation argues against novel malware. The verdict above already reflects these — the panel just explains what was applied.
- Versions published
- 9
- First published
- May 2026
- Publisher
- trojanbox
Recommended action
Looks clean — keep monitoringNo high-signal indicators in the stored static report. PkgRadar will re-check on the next ingest pass.
Block this release in CIcurl · GitHub Actions
Fail the build when this package version is added or upgraded. Replace $PKGRADAR_TOKEN with a Pro / Team API key from your dashboard.
curl -fsS https://pkgradar.com/gate/npm \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $PKGRADAR_TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"specs":["@trojanbox-vcp-test/[email protected]"],"fail_on":"review"}'GitHub Actions step:
- name: PkgRadar gate
run: |
curl -fsS https://pkgradar.com/gate/npm \
-H "Authorization: Bearer ${{ secrets.PKGRADAR_TOKEN }}" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"specs":["@trojanbox-vcp-test/[email protected]"],"fail_on":"review"}'Why flagged
What the scanner saw
No high-signal static finding in the saved report.
Not observed: package install, lifecycle script execution, or sandbox execution. PkgRadar only inspects on-disk artifacts.
Availability ledger
available
Status history (1 event)
- new → available · risk low · score 0 · status changed
Evidence
Static findings
No findings stored for this release.
Manifest
Package metadata
Scripts2
buildpnpm --dir ../contracts build && node -e "require('node:fs').rmSync('dist', { recursive: true, force: true })" && tsc -p tsconfig.build.json && node -e "const fs=require('node:fs'); fs.mkdirSync('dist', { recursive: true }); fs.copyFileSync('src/webpack-loader.cjs', 'dist/webpack-loader.cjs'); fs.copyFileSync('src/webpack-loader.d.ts', 'dist/webpack-loader.d.ts')"typechecktsc -p tsconfig.json --noEmit
Dependencies5
@babel/generator^7.29.1@babel/parser^7.29.3@babel/traverse^7.29.0@babel/types^7.29.0@trojanbox-vcp-test/contracts^0.3.3