Trust signals
Why this verdict
PkgRadar discounts a release’s score when public reputation argues against novel malware. The verdict above already reflects these — the panel just explains what was applied.
- Weekly downloads
- 163
- Versions published
- 5
- First published
- Apr 2026
- Publisher
- nashiluoyuji
Recommended action
Looks clean — keep monitoringNo high-signal indicators in the stored static report. PkgRadar will re-check on the next ingest pass.
Block this release in CIcurl · GitHub Actions
Fail the build when this package version is added or upgraded. Replace $PKGRADAR_TOKEN with a Pro / Team API key from your dashboard.
curl -fsS https://pkgradar.com/gate/npm \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $PKGRADAR_TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"specs":["@tablestore/[email protected]"],"fail_on":"review"}'GitHub Actions step:
- name: PkgRadar gate
run: |
curl -fsS https://pkgradar.com/gate/npm \
-H "Authorization: Bearer ${{ secrets.PKGRADAR_TOKEN }}" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"specs":["@tablestore/[email protected]"],"fail_on":"review"}'Why flagged
What the scanner saw
No high-signal static finding in the saved report.
Not observed: package install, lifecycle script execution, or sandbox execution. PkgRadar only inspects on-disk artifacts.
Availability ledger
available
Status history (1 event)
- new → available · risk low · score 0 · status changed
Evidence
Static findings
No findings stored for this release.
Manifest
Package metadata
Scripts9
buildnpm run clean && tsc -p tsconfig.json && tsc -p tsconfig.cjs.json && node scripts/write-cjs-package-json.cjscleanrm -rf distprepacknpm run buildtestvitest runtest:e2evitest run tests/e2etest:package:cjsnpm run build && node tests/package-commonjs.cjstest:package:contentsnode tests/package-contents.cjstest:publish-scriptnode tests/publish-script-auth.cjstest:unitvitest run tests/unit
Dependencies1
ali-oss^6.23.0