Trust signals
Why this verdict
PkgRadar discounts a release’s score when public reputation argues against novel malware. The verdict above already reflects these — the panel just explains what was applied.
- Versions published
- 5
- First published
- Jan 2022
- Publisher
- gemshelf
Recommended action
Looks clean — keep monitoringNo high-signal indicators in the stored static report. PkgRadar will re-check on the next ingest pass.
Block this release in CIcurl · GitHub Actions
Fail the build when this package version is added or upgraded. Replace $PKGRADAR_TOKEN with a Pro / Team API key from your dashboard.
curl -fsS https://pkgradar.com/gate/npm \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $PKGRADAR_TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"specs":["@shelf/[email protected]"],"fail_on":"review"}'GitHub Actions step:
- name: PkgRadar gate
run: |
curl -fsS https://pkgradar.com/gate/npm \
-H "Authorization: Bearer ${{ secrets.PKGRADAR_TOKEN }}" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"specs":["@shelf/[email protected]"],"fail_on":"review"}'Why flagged
What the scanner saw
No high-signal static finding in the saved report.
Not observed: package install, lifecycle script execution, or sandbox execution. PkgRadar only inspects on-disk artifacts.
Availability ledger
available
Status history (1 event)
- new → available · risk low · score 0 · status changed
Evidence
Static findings
No findings stored for this release.
Manifest
Package metadata
Scripts11
benchmarkbabel benchmark.ts | nodebuildrm -rf lib/ && yarn build:types && yarn build:codebuild:codebabel src --out-dir lib --ignore '**/*.test.ts' --extensions '.ts' && find ./lib -name '*.test.d.ts' -deletebuild:typestsc --emitDeclarationOnly --declaration --isolatedModules false --declarationDir libcoverageyarn test --coveragelintyarn lint:ci --fixlint:cieslint . --ext .js,.ts,.jsonprepackyarn buildtestTZ=UTC jest srctype-checktsc --noEmittype-check:watchnpm run type-check -- --watch
Dependencies1
white-space-x4.1.1