Trust signals
Why this verdict
PkgRadar discounts a release’s score when public reputation argues against novel malware. The verdict above already reflects these — the panel just explains what was applied.
- Weekly downloads
- 26
- Versions published
- 10
- First published
- Apr 2026
- Publisher
- nguylabs
Recommended action
Review before promotingMixed signals: the package has indicators worth reading before allowing the update in automated dependency flows.
Block this release in CIcurl · GitHub Actions
Fail the build when this package version is added or upgraded. Replace $PKGRADAR_TOKEN with a Pro / Team API key from your dashboard.
curl -fsS https://pkgradar.com/gate/npm \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $PKGRADAR_TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"specs":["@nguylabs/[email protected]"],"fail_on":"review"}'GitHub Actions step:
- name: PkgRadar gate
run: |
curl -fsS https://pkgradar.com/gate/npm \
-H "Authorization: Bearer ${{ secrets.PKGRADAR_TOKEN }}" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"specs":["@nguylabs/[email protected]"],"fail_on":"review"}'Why flagged
What the scanner saw
Credential file access: matched "GITHUB_TOKEN"
Not observed: package install, lifecycle script execution, or sandbox execution. PkgRadar only inspects on-disk artifacts.
Availability ledger
available
Status history (1 event)
- new → available · risk review · score 5 · status changed
Evidence
Static findings
1 static · 0 from release diff · showing high-signal first.
No high-signal findings — see all findings below.
Show all 1 findings (low-signal and informational)
| Severity | Kind | Path | Detail | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| low | Credential file access | package/dist/providers/github-issues.js | matched "GITHUB_TOKEN" | 5 |
Manifest
Package metadata
Scripts4
buildtscpretestnpm run buildtestvitest runtest:watchvitest
Dependencies7
@inquirer/prompts^7.4.0@linear/sdk^29.0.0@octokit/rest^21.1.1chalk^5.4.1commander^13.1.0glob^11.0.1js-yaml^4.1.0