Trust signals
Why this verdict
PkgRadar discounts a release’s score when public reputation argues against novel malware. The verdict above already reflects these — the panel just explains what was applied.
- Versions published
- 2
- First published
- Jun 2026
- Publisher
- dimasc_io
Recommended action
Review before promotingMixed signals: the package has indicators worth reading before allowing the update in automated dependency flows.
Block this release in CIcurl · GitHub Actions
Fail the build when this package version is added or upgraded. Replace $PKGRADAR_TOKEN with a Pro / Team API key from your dashboard.
curl -fsS https://pkgradar.com/gate/npm \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $PKGRADAR_TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"specs":["@lesto/[email protected]"],"fail_on":"review"}'GitHub Actions step:
- name: PkgRadar gate
run: |
curl -fsS https://pkgradar.com/gate/npm \
-H "Authorization: Bearer ${{ secrets.PKGRADAR_TOKEN }}" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"specs":["@lesto/[email protected]"],"fail_on":"review"}'Why flagged
What the scanner saw
Suspicious Publish Context
Not observed: package install, lifecycle script execution, or sandbox execution. PkgRadar only inspects on-disk artifacts.
Availability ledger
available
Status history (1 event)
- new → available · risk review · score 10 · status changed
Evidence
Static findings
1 static · 0 from release diff · showing high-signal first.
| Severity | Kind | Path | Detail | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| medium | Suspicious Publish Context | manifest | — | 10 |
Manifest
Package metadata
Scripts 6
Sign in to view install / lifecycle script contents.
Dependencies13
@lesto/content-sharedworkspace:*@rehype-pretty/transformers^0.13.2rehype-parse^9.0.1rehype-pretty-code^0.14.1rehype-sanitize^6.0.0rehype-slug^6.0.0rehype-stringify^10.0.0remark-gfm^4.0.0remark-parse^11.0.0remark-rehype^11.0.0shiki^3.20.0unified^11.0.0unist-util-visit^5.0.0