Trust signals
Why this verdict
PkgRadar discounts a release’s score when public reputation argues against novel malware. The verdict above already reflects these — the panel just explains what was applied.
- Versions published
- 86
- First published
- Apr 2026
- Publisher
- helloxesca
Recommended action
Looks clean — keep monitoringNo high-signal indicators in the stored static report. PkgRadar will re-check on the next ingest pass.
Block this release in CIcurl · GitHub Actions
Fail the build when this package version is added or upgraded. Replace $PKGRADAR_TOKEN with a Pro / Team API key from your dashboard.
curl -fsS https://pkgradar.com/gate/npm \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $PKGRADAR_TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"specs":["@gluecharm-lab/[email protected]"],"fail_on":"review"}'GitHub Actions step:
- name: PkgRadar gate
run: |
curl -fsS https://pkgradar.com/gate/npm \
-H "Authorization: Bearer ${{ secrets.PKGRADAR_TOKEN }}" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"specs":["@gluecharm-lab/[email protected]"],"fail_on":"review"}'Why flagged
What the scanner saw
No high-signal static finding in the saved report.
Not observed: package install, lifecycle script execution, or sandbox execution. PkgRadar only inspects on-disk artifacts.
Availability ledger
available
Status history (1 event)
- new → available · risk low · score 0 · status changed
Evidence
Static findings
No findings stored for this release.
Manifest
Package metadata
Scripts12
buildnode scripts/build.mjs && npm run build:tscbuild:tsctsc -p tsconfig.jsonpacknpm packprepacknpm run buildprofile:clinode scripts/profile-cli.mjsprofile:cli:cpunode scripts/profile-cli.mjs cpuprofile:cli:doctornode scripts/profile-cli.mjs doctorprofile:cli:flamenode scripts/profile-cli.mjs flameprofile:cli:heapnode scripts/profile-cli.mjs heapprofile:cli:heap-nodenode scripts/profile-cli.mjs heap-nodetestnode scripts/run-tests.mjstypechecktsc -p tsconfig.json --noEmit
Dependencies4
ajv^8.18.0ajv-formats^3.0.1commander^12.1.0jsonrepair^3.14.0