Trust signals
Why this verdict
PkgRadar discounts a release’s score when public reputation argues against novel malware. The verdict above already reflects these — the panel just explains what was applied.
- Weekly downloads
- 11
- Versions published
- 9
- First published
- Oct 2025
- Publisher
- dothinh
Recommended action
Review before promotingMixed signals: the package has indicators worth reading before allowing the update in automated dependency flows.
Block this release in CIcurl · GitHub Actions
Fail the build when this package version is added or upgraded. Replace $PKGRADAR_TOKEN with a Pro / Team API key from your dashboard.
curl -fsS https://pkgradar.com/gate/npm \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $PKGRADAR_TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"specs":["@enfyra/[email protected]"],"fail_on":"review"}'GitHub Actions step:
- name: PkgRadar gate
run: |
curl -fsS https://pkgradar.com/gate/npm \
-H "Authorization: Bearer ${{ secrets.PKGRADAR_TOKEN }}" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"specs":["@enfyra/[email protected]"],"fail_on":"review"}'Why flagged
What the scanner saw
Credential file access: matched ".npmrc"
Not observed: package install, lifecycle script execution, or sandbox execution. PkgRadar only inspects on-disk artifacts.
Availability ledger
available
Status history (1 event)
- new → available · risk review · score 5 · status changed
Evidence
Static findings
2 static · 0 from release diff · showing high-signal first.
No high-signal findings — see all findings below.
Show all 2 findings (low-signal and informational)
| Severity | Kind | Path | Detail | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| low | Credential file access | package/components/project-setup.js | matched ".npmrc" | 5 |
| low | Obfuscation Density | package/package-lock.json | high encoded/escaped-token density | 0 |
Manifest
Package metadata
Scripts1
testecho "Error: no test specified" && exit 1
Dependencies6
chalk^4.1.2commander^11.1.0fs-extra^11.1.1giget^2.0.0inquirer^8.2.5ora^5.4.1