Trust signals
Why this verdict
PkgRadar discounts a release’s score when public reputation argues against novel malware. The verdict above already reflects these — the panel just explains what was applied.
- Versions published
- 6
- First published
- Aug 2017
- Publisher
- adriean.khisbe
Recommended action
Review before promotingMixed signals: the package has indicators worth reading before allowing the update in automated dependency flows.
Block this release in CIcurl · GitHub Actions
Fail the build when this package version is added or upgraded. Replace $PKGRADAR_TOKEN with a Pro / Team API key from your dashboard.
curl -fsS https://pkgradar.com/gate/npm \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $PKGRADAR_TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"specs":["@coorpacademy/[email protected]"],"fail_on":"review"}'GitHub Actions step:
- name: PkgRadar gate
run: |
curl -fsS https://pkgradar.com/gate/npm \
-H "Authorization: Bearer ${{ secrets.PKGRADAR_TOKEN }}" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"specs":["@coorpacademy/[email protected]"],"fail_on":"review"}'Why flagged
What the scanner saw
Credential file access: matched "AWS_ACCESS_KEY"
Not observed: package install, lifecycle script execution, or sandbox execution. PkgRadar only inspects on-disk artifacts.
Availability ledger
available
Status history (1 event)
- new → available · risk review · score 3 · status changed
Evidence
Static findings
1 static · 0 from release diff · showing high-signal first.
No high-signal findings — see all findings below.
Show all 1 findings (low-signal and informational)
| Severity | Kind | Path | Detail | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| low | Credential file access | package/package.json | matched "AWS_ACCESS_KEY" | 3 |
Manifest
Package metadata
Scripts5
linteslint . --ext .js,.jsonlint:fixnpm run lint -- --fixpublish-coveragenyc report --reporter=lcov > coverage.lcov && codecovtestnpm run lint && npm run test:onlytest:onlynyc ava
Dependencies5
async^3.1.0aws4^1.9.0awscred^1.5.0lru-cache^5.1.1once^1.4.0