Trust signals
Why this verdict
PkgRadar discounts a release’s score when public reputation argues against novel malware. The verdict above already reflects these — the panel just explains what was applied.
- Weekly downloads
- 2,399Niche · −30% score
- Versions published
- 37
- First published
- May 2026
- Publisher
- andre-p
Effective trust discount applied: −30% (max across signals — discounts don’t stack). New install-lifecycle deltas vs the previous release would clear the discount.
Recommended action
Looks clean — keep monitoringNo high-signal indicators in the stored static report. PkgRadar will re-check on the next ingest pass.
Block this release in CIcurl · GitHub Actions
Fail the build when this package version is added or upgraded. Replace $PKGRADAR_TOKEN with a Pro / Team API key from your dashboard.
curl -fsS https://pkgradar.com/gate/npm \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $PKGRADAR_TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"specs":["@cello-protocol/[email protected]"],"fail_on":"review"}'GitHub Actions step:
- name: PkgRadar gate
run: |
curl -fsS https://pkgradar.com/gate/npm \
-H "Authorization: Bearer ${{ secrets.PKGRADAR_TOKEN }}" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"specs":["@cello-protocol/[email protected]"],"fail_on":"review"}'Why flagged
What the scanner saw
No high-signal static finding in the saved report.
Not observed: package install, lifecycle script execution, or sandbox execution. PkgRadar only inspects on-disk artifacts.
Availability ledger
available
Status history (1 event)
- new → available · risk low · score 0 · status changed
Evidence
Static findings
No findings stored for this release.
Manifest
Package metadata
Scripts 2
Sign in to view install / lifecycle script contents.
Dependencies7
@cello-protocol/client0.0.31@cello-protocol/crypto0.0.7@cello-protocol/interfaces0.0.3@cello-protocol/transport0.0.4@libp2p/peer-id^6.0.8@modelcontextprotocol/sdk^1.29.0zod^4.4.2