Trust signals
Why this verdict
PkgRadar discounts a release’s score when public reputation argues against novel malware. The verdict above already reflects these — the panel just explains what was applied.
- Versions published
- 6
- First published
- May 2023
- Publisher
- lzxue
Recommended action
Looks clean — keep monitoringNo high-signal indicators in the stored static report. PkgRadar will re-check on the next ingest pass.
Block this release in CIcurl · GitHub Actions
Fail the build when this package version is added or upgraded. Replace $PKGRADAR_TOKEN with a Pro / Team API key from your dashboard.
curl -fsS https://pkgradar.com/gate/npm \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $PKGRADAR_TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"specs":["@antv/[email protected]"],"fail_on":"review"}'GitHub Actions step:
- name: PkgRadar gate
run: |
curl -fsS https://pkgradar.com/gate/npm \
-H "Authorization: Bearer ${{ secrets.PKGRADAR_TOKEN }}" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"specs":["@antv/[email protected]"],"fail_on":"review"}'Why flagged
What the scanner saw
No high-signal static finding in the saved report.
Not observed: package install, lifecycle script execution, or sandbox execution. PkgRadar only inspects on-disk artifacts.
Availability ledger
available
Status history (1 event)
- new → available · risk low · score 0 · status changed
Evidence
Static findings
No findings stored for this release.
Manifest
Package metadata
Scripts12
buildfather buildbuild:watchfather devdeploydumi build && gh-pages -d docs-distdevdumi devdocs:builddumi builddoctorfather doctorlintnpm run lint:es && npm run lint:csslint:cssstylelint "{src,test}/**/*.{css,less}"lint:eseslint "{src,test}/**/*.{js,jsx,ts,tsx}"preparehusky install && dumi setupprepublishOnlyfather doctor && npm run buildstartnpm run dev
Dependencies10
@ant-design/icons^5.0.1@types/d3-contour^3.0.2ahooks^3.7.7antd^5.5.1d3-contour^4.0.2monaco-editor^0.38.0monaco-editor-webpack-plugin^7.0.1react-monaco-editor^0.52.0simplify-js^1.2.4sphericalmercator^1.0.5