Trust signals
Why this verdict
PkgRadar discounts a release’s score when public reputation argues against novel malware. The verdict above already reflects these — the panel just explains what was applied.
- Versions published
- 2
- First published
- May 2026
- Publisher
- xiaoshuo1988
Recommended action
Review before promotingMixed signals: the package has indicators worth reading before allowing the update in automated dependency flows.
Block this release in CIcurl · GitHub Actions
Fail the build when this package version is added or upgraded. Replace $PKGRADAR_TOKEN with a Pro / Team API key from your dashboard.
curl -fsS https://pkgradar.com/gate/npm \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $PKGRADAR_TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"specs":["@agentcontextbus/[email protected]"],"fail_on":"review"}'GitHub Actions step:
- name: PkgRadar gate
run: |
curl -fsS https://pkgradar.com/gate/npm \
-H "Authorization: Bearer ${{ secrets.PKGRADAR_TOKEN }}" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"specs":["@agentcontextbus/[email protected]"],"fail_on":"review"}'Why flagged
What the scanner saw
Credential file access: matched ".npmrc"
Not observed: package install, lifecycle script execution, or sandbox execution. PkgRadar only inspects on-disk artifacts.
Availability ledger
available
Status history (1 event)
- new → available · risk review · score 5 · status changed
Evidence
Static findings
1 static · 0 from release diff · showing high-signal first.
No high-signal findings — see all findings below.
Show all 1 findings (low-signal and informational)
| Severity | Kind | Path | Detail | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| low | Credential file access | package/bin/acb.js | matched ".npmrc" | 5 |
Manifest
Package metadata
Scripts3
lintnode --check bin/acb.js && node --check lib/runtime.js && node --check lib/prompts.js && node --check lib/fingerprint.js && node --check lib/git.js && node --check lib/packet-state.js && node --check lib/setup-guides.jstestnode --testverifynpm run lint && npm test